![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhTHAfBk9Bcjbj4KjGzqT4nSTYAHqgru19iVx9DhC3CiktH3L78TtCmwa0hkUpJdlk5M1-NWg7gmGpChbWLvPIylnYdTIy2heop6NtoUZA1LOvmWvhgm8X8e-Q8Zbe5SHph-qKVnDJeIA/s320/images%252811%2529.jpg)
It was in the bid to find answers to these questions that I realized that Nigeria had financial problems sponsoring the athletes and encouraging the athletes to Rio, yet ambassadors were sponsored to Rio. Perhaps the fate of the Rio team could have been different if a designated fund for an African games held in Congo last year hadn’t been declared missing or embezzled one way or the other.
Sending over 70 athletes to another country with little preparation, the president gave a speech on dwindling revenue and global economic challenges being a factor to the inadequate funding of the trip. But an ambassador who has no link whatsoever to games or sports was sponsored to Rio. Which brings me back to how House Ambassadors in Nigeria came to be. Was it based on influence in the society? Popularity? Did some people bribe their way into the ambassadorial seat just because they needed power and affluence one way or the other? How is it that some set of people get paid and recognized as ambassadors and their impact isn’t felt in and on Nigeria?
Some even have this seat as titles and strength to their political prowess.
When I was younger , I learnt that an ambassador is a trustworthy, deserving and accredited individual who is well learned and vast in knowledge sent by a country as its representative in a foreign country. Ambassadors used to be people who represent the interests of the country to foreign government, people who are extraordinary, passionate and selfless. People who bring solutions, ideas and innovations from other countries. Wouldn’t it be such a relief if our house ambassadors are like this?